Loading
Loading
A furniture maker selling configurable pieces through a platform that could not describe them, moved onto one that could — without pausing trade.

Services
Our role. Content modelling, platform engineering, migration and design system delivery.
Ashcombe & Fell has made furniture in the same workshop since 1974. It sells around sixty pieces, most of which can be specified in several timbers, finishes and dimensions, and roughly half of which are made to order with a lead time measured in months.
Its commerce platform could describe a product with a size and a colour. Everything else — the timber, the finish, the lead time, the fact that a piece is made by hand and the grain will differ — lived in free-text description fields maintained by one person.
Customers were phoning to ask questions the site should have answered, and the workshop was quoting by email for configurations the site could not represent.
We spent the first phase with the workshop rather than the marketing team, modelling how a piece is actually specified: what varies, what is constrained by what, and which combinations are not made.
The interface was designed around specifying a piece, with lead time and price responding as choices are made, and the constraints explained where they bite rather than hidden.
A small component system was delivered alongside the platform so the in-house team could compose new campaign and editorial pages without commissioning design work each time.
Editorial and collection pages moved first, then the catalogue, then checkout — each with redirect mapping and a rollback path we had rehearsed.
A structured product model that describes a piece the way the workshop does, including the combinations that cannot be made and why.
A configuration journey that shows price and lead time as they change, with photography and material detail attached to the choices rather than to the product as a whole.
A component system the in-house team uses to build campaign and editorial pages without a development ticket.
“They understood in the first week that the timber is not a colour swatch. Everyone else we spoke to wanted to make it one, because that is what their platform supported.”

The Calder Institute
A research institute with sixty years of output spread across four incompatible systems, consolidated onto one durable publishing platform.
Read the case study
Meridian Rail
A passenger operator whose nine digital products had drifted into nine different interfaces, brought back into one system with accessibility as the organising constraint.
Read the case studyA first conversation is an hour, costs nothing, and usually ends with a straight answer about whether we are the right studio for the problem.